[Chester LUG] ccna etc

Michael Crilly mrcrilly at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 2 15:41:45 UTC 2010


Same here Thomas! I think I have three switches and two routers, but haven't
done a lot with them really.

I'm free this Saturday through the day.

Cheers,

Mike.

On 2 November 2010 14:56, Thomas Prophett <thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>wrote:

> Hi Nev / Michael,
>
> Sounds good, I'm based in nantwich and drive... swapping resources and
> knowledge sounds really good, i built a ccna lab about 2yrs ago &
> haven't done much with it since!
>
> Regards
> Thomas.
>
> On 2 November 2010 14:38, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Good stuff Nev.
> >
> > I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm
> confident I can self study it all.
> >
> > If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up
> at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
> >
> > I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have
> a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
> >
> > Let me know.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Mike.
> >
> > On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett <thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Nev
> >>
> >> Who did you do the ccna course with?
> >>
> >> Thomas.
> >>
> >> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> hi mike
> >>>
> >>> thanks for the welcome
> >>>
> >>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
> >>> manchester, manic to say the least!
> >>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
> >>>
> >>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
> >>> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
> >>>
> >>> ta
> >>>
> >>> nev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Nev,
> >>>>
> >>>> Welcome to the list :)
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
> confident,
> >>>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with
> a lot
> >>>> of the material already covered.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train
> Signal
> >>>> videos I have which are decent :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Let me know mate.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk
> >>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> hi mike
> >>>>>
> >>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> nev
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> >>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
> >>>>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mike.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns <
> stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> >>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is
> default, ie
> >>>>>>> the WAN:)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly <mrcrilly at googlemail.com
> >>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
> >>>>>>>    Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
> >>>>>>>    own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    Regards,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    Mike.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
> >>>>>>>    <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> >>>>>>>    <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    Hiya,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    Is anyone really good with pfsense.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
> >>>>>>>>    from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
> >>>>>>>>    links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16** <http://10.0.0.0/16
> >***
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    WAN is provided by DHCP
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
> >>>>>>>>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
> >>>>>>>>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
> >>>>>>>>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
> >>>>>>>>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
> >>>>>>>>    fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
> >>>>>>>>    warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
> >>>>>>>>    <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
> >>>>>>>>    cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use  a default route to push it out
> >>>>>>>>    the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
> >>>>>>>>    any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    Anyone know if its even possible ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    Regards
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    Stuart
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    ***
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    ***
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>    Chester mailing list
> >>>>>>>>    Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >>>>>>>>    https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    ***
> >>>>>>>    ***
> >>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>    Chester mailing list
> >>>>>>>    Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >>>>>>>    https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    ***
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ***
> >>>>>>> ***
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ***
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> Chester mailing list
> >>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>>>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/
> >**,
> >>>>>> and is
> >>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
> >>>>>
> >>>>> **
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
> >>>>>> Chester mailing list
> >>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >>>>>> *
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>>>> dangerous content by **MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>*,
> and
> >>>>> is
> >>>>> believed to be clean. ***
> >>>>> **_______________________________________________****
> >>>>> Chester mailing list
> >>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
> >>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >>>>> **
> >>>>
> >>>> **
> >>>> --
> >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
> and is
> >>>> believed to be clean. **
> >>>> **
> >>>> **
> >>>>
> >>>> **
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Chester mailing list
> >>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> >>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >>>> **
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> >>> believed to be clean.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Chester mailing list
> >>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> >>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Chester mailing list
> >> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> >> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Chester mailing list
> > Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>



-- 
Regards,

Michael Crilly.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20101102/3d71bc41/attachment.html>


More information about the Chester mailing list