You could always install it in Virtualbox and see how you like it, nothing lost if you don't. Just delete it!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 22 February 2013 16:23, Roger Gibson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rcgibson@talktalk.net" target="_blank">rcgibson@talktalk.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<tt>And I was just going to give Mint a try. I'll wait for an 'All
Clear'</tt><tt> before I go down that path. Have to say that now
I've got used to it, the latest Ubuntu desk top 'straight out of
the box' seems as good as any, but then I don't push it hard.</tt><tt>
Roger. </tt><br><div><div class="h5">
<br>
<div>On 22/02/2013 15:54, Les Pritchard
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi all,<br>
<br>
</div>
Last night I decided to give Mint a go on one of my
primary desktop systems. I've used the Debian edition
and previous Gnome versions in the past, but with all
the the Gnome changes I have found myself using KDE
more.<br>
<br>
</div>
So I grabbed the KDE version of the latest Mint and
installed it with no problems. All worked really well
and I was pleased with hardware support etc. The problem
came when I tried to run an update. Apt-get returned a
whole load of 404s when trying to update, saying the
servers could not be found.<br>
<br>
</div>
A quick look into the sources file showed me that the
repos they had for the Ubuntu servers all referenced the
code name for the Mint distro and not the matched Ubuntu
edition! (All these code names are just annoying in my
opinion). So a quick change of the name to the correct
Ubuntu code name and all the updates worked perfectly.<br>
<br>
</div>
A quick Google suggests that others have seen this problem
too. I find it very hard to believe that a distro could be
rolled with such a simple error. Also being such a trivial
error, that it hasn't been quickly fixed amazed me. The
experience didn't fill me with confidence about the distro
at all.<br>
<br>
</div>
Has anyone else found any other issues with it? Should I be
going back to Ubuntu after all this time?! Or over to
something like Fedora / Mageia / Fuduntu...<br>
<br>
</div>
Les<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><div class="im"><pre>_______________________________________________
Chester mailing list
<a href="mailto:Chester@mailman.lug.org.uk" target="_blank">Chester@mailman.lug.org.uk</a>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester</a>
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div><p color="#000000" align="left">No virus
found in this message.<br>
Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6118 - Release Date:
02/20/13</p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<br>
<pre cols="72">--
</pre>
</font></span></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<a></a><p color="#000000" align="left">No virus found in this message.<br>
Checked by AVG - <a href="http://www.avg.com" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>
Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6118 - Release Date: 02/20/13</p>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Chester mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Chester@mailman.lug.org.uk">Chester@mailman.lug.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Stuart Burns <br>E: <a href="mailto:stuart.james.burns@gmail.com" target="_blank">stuart.james.burns@gmail.com</a><br>M: [redacted]<br><br>