[dundee] Image hard drive to file

Chad Wollenberg chad at linuxbasement.com
Mon Feb 25 01:44:58 GMT 2008


I'm not sure what you guys are arguing about, but I've imaged partitions
mounted in read only mode.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Robert McWilliam <rmcw at allmail.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:29:10 +0000 (GMT), "Lee Hughes"
> <toxicnaan at yahoo.co.uk> said:
> > think next time? is this a wind up?
>
> I was wondering the same about your responses.
>
> > ask a few professional unix admins, and get back to me with the results?
>
> I don't care how many professional admins tell me I can't image a
> mounted partition that isn't going to make it true. Being mounted isn't
> the thing that can make the image screwed up it is the fs changing while
> you are imaging it, unmounting isn't the only way to stop a fs changing.
>
> > it's your data, do what you want with it ;-).
> >
> > just do advise people to do that, because
>
> Has a "not" gone missing or is looking like silly head (twice)
> desirable?
> ________________________________________________________
> Robert McWilliam     rmcw at allmail.net    www.ormiret.com
>
> Everything should be made as simple as possible - but no simpler.
>        -- Albert Einstein
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dundee GNU/Linux Users Group mailing list
> dundee at lists.lug.org.uk  http://dundee.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee
> Chat on IRC, #tlug on dundee.lug.org.uk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/dundee/attachments/20080225/be42523b/attachment.html


More information about the dundee mailing list