[dundee] Emacs and org-mode

Nistur nistur at googlemail.com
Tue May 18 16:19:28 UTC 2010


Oh HELL yes. I'm just using \cite and it works prettyful now :P I
forgot to recompile the .bib file (stupid me!) I still haven't found a
variant in the harvard package that will do the bibliography nicely...

Thanks all for help. I might end up just doing the "bibliography"
section manually as it will just contain a couple of things not in the
references. I don't think it needs to have duplicate information.

Also. URLs are still overflowing the page. :( Meh!

Thanks again everyone :)

Nistur

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Nistur <nistur at googlemail.com> wrote:
> Rawr. I use the harvard package \citeaffixed{} and it gives (. ?)
> if I use \citep* in natbib, I get (1) neither are useful :'(
>
> Nistur
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Nistur <nistur at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I've just discovered that agsm is part of a harvard package, so I'm
>> looking at that, I can sort that now. Got examples in the docs :D
>>
>> We've been told that the references is what we refer to in our text,
>> whereas the bibliography contains all background reading we've done,
>> whether we've referred to it or not.
>>
>> Nistur
>>
>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Robert McWilliam <rmcw at allmail.net> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Nistur wrote:
>>>> Ok, getting there. Slowly. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> So, I now have the bibliography added in (manually). I have 2 questions.
>>>> 1. how do I change it to Harvard style citations? (Blackmore, 2001)
>>>> rather than [1]
>>>
>>> The natbib package adds different citation commands which cite with a
>>> different styles. \citep or \citep* would give output like (Blackmore,
>>> 2001) - without the * it puts in et al. when there are more authors,
>>> with the * it lists them all.
>>>
>>>> 2. Is there any way to get it to make a references section and a
>>>> bibliography? Apparently we need both (yes, I know it's retarded...)
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what the difference between the two would be... Have you
>>> got an example I can have a look at?
>>>
>>>    Robert
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>> Robert McWilliam            rmcw at allmail.net             www.ormiret.com
>>>
>>> A slipping gear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you
>>> least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of
>>> your unit. -- the US Army's magazine of preventive maintenance.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dundee GNU/Linux Users Group mailing list
>>> dundee at lists.lug.org.uk  http://dundeelug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee
>>> Chat on IRC, #tlug on irc.lug.org.uk
>>>
>>
>



More information about the dundee mailing list