Lol, fair enough. Yeah, it's on a server with 2.6GHz dual core Xeons. I hadn't realised that the pthreads thing stopped it from working properly before.<br><br>It was just generally faster for encoding a .mov than the normal encoder I had been using is. Suppose it's kinda relative though.
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 21/01/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">James Le Cuirot</b> <<a href="mailto:chewi@aura-online.co.uk">chewi@aura-online.co.uk</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
You think so? I've always found it to be much slower than the others.<br>It's certainly more intensive for decoding at the very least. Maybe<br>you have a multi-core CPU and you hadn't enabled threads before? But
<br>hey, don't let me spoil your fun. (-;<br><br>James<br><br><br>On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:48:29 +0000<br>"chris wyllie" <<a href="mailto:cgwyllie@googlemail.com">cgwyllie@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br>
> After discovering this enabling x264 was easy. It is a REALLY quick<br>> codec!<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>dundee GNU/Linux Users Group mailing list<br><a href="mailto:dundee@lists.lug.org.uk">
dundee@lists.lug.org.uk</a> <a href="http://dundee.lug.org.uk">http://dundee.lug.org.uk</a><br><a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee</a><br>Chat on IRC, #tlug on
<a href="http://dundee.lug.org.uk">dundee.lug.org.uk</a><br></blockquote></div><br>