[Gllug] CentOS and RHES

Rich Walker rw at shadow.org.uk
Wed Oct 26 14:46:28 UTC 2005


Tethys <sta296 at astradyne.co.uk> writes:

> Jason Clifford writes:
>
>>It doesn't change the fact that changing from *version 4.1* to **version 
>>4.2** is also a version upgrade and also made significant changes.
>
> No, I'd have to disagree with this. Are you claiming that running
> "apt-get update" constitutes a version upgrade? 

If the machine is running testing, then yes, you should treat it as
such.

If it's running stable, then no.

> Because that's all this is. For convenience, RHEL package up the base
> OS with all the latest updates applied, and that's all that CentOS
> have copied here.  There's no significance to the version number,
> other than "it contains all the updates up to XYZ date".

Is there broad incremental testing of the updates that are going to
occur when you do the 4.1->4.2 transition, as there is in
Debian/testing?

cheers, Rich.

>
> Tet
> -- 
> Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
> http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug

-- 
rich walker         |  Shadow Robot Company | rw at shadow.org.uk
technical director     251 Liverpool Road   |
need a Hand?           London  N1 1LX       | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug




More information about the GLLUG mailing list