[Gllug] Introductions to Databases

Bruce Richardson itsbruce at workshy.org
Fri Jul 17 14:56:59 UTC 2009


On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 02:58:16PM +0100, Richard wrote:
> 
> I don't remember the developers ignoring data corruption bugs even back 
> in the 6.x series

I never said they did, for the good reason that they didn't.  Just
trying to throw some historical perspective on what seems to be a rather
fanboy-ish debate.  Personally, my instincts were always to favour
Postgresql's much more correct design and I'd 100% agree with what Sean
said about many developers simply not realsing you can do more with a DB
than they do.  That said, in practice I have often found Postgresql a
royal pain in production use and the lack of decent replication has
swung the balance in favour of MySQL more than once in those situations
(that or frankly sucky filesystem performance from Postgresq for some
usage patterns).

-- 
Bruce

Hierophant: someone who remembers, when you are on the way down,
everything you did to them on the way up.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/gllug/attachments/20090717/cd6133e4/attachment.pgp>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug


More information about the GLLUG mailing list