On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:17 , Robert Crowther <robertc@boogdesign.com> sent:

>Henry Gilbert wrote:
> > Apologies for being pedantic (I was brainwashed by this!).
>> But better than using  - I would use real semantic tags like ,
>> , ,, ..  for first title, etc ...
>>
>I forgot to mention the other change Imade to the CSS file:
>
>.question p {
>	display: inline;
>}
>
>This was because I couldn't get rid of the  which went around the
>question (but not around the number) because it seems the way that is
>formatted is controlled by an entirely different xslt file.  I didn't
>really want to end up with nested paragraphs, so I stuck with divs.  I
>agree that it would be better to have properly semantic markup, but I
>think that would have introduced a whole new level of complexity
>compared to the minor hacking of one xslt file which I was doing.
>You're welcome to have a go though ;)

Ok, so much for reading my email via a web browser :-)  Talk about messing with someone's mind.  That came through in huge red type the everone across the room could read.  Kinda reminds me of the newby html author searching for help on how to write html pages and searching the web for "html"...

Andy


-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug@gllug.org.uk
http://lists.gllug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/gllug


