<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><BR><DIV><DIV>On 4 Apr 2006, at 18:07, John Winters wrote:</DIV><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><FONT class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></FONT></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">You can avoid the double ring tone by not answering the BT line until</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">the intended recipient answers.<SPAN class="Apple-converted-space"> </SPAN>Of course Asterisk then doesn't get the</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">opportunity to listen for incoming faxes, but if you're not using that</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">line for incoming faxes then it makes sense not to Answer().</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"><DIV>Agreed - you will also not piss off people who have to pay to call you but don't wait to leave you a message. At the moment you're forcing people to pay for a call where you or the answer service may not answer.</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>M@t :o)</DIV></BODY></HTML>