<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 25/05/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Peter Childs</b> <<a href="mailto:peterachilds@gmail.com">peterachilds@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Oh Ok I can swap that, I spose but quite a few debian packages are marked to depend on gs-esp but I could just change the link in /etc/alternatives to that.</blockquote><div><br><br>Sorry meant ubuntu there. Would it not be better to just say that packages required gs and that gs (a meta package) was supplied by either gs-esd, gs-gpl or gs-afpl. Then if you don't mind that gs-afpl is non-free you can just install it and uninstall gs-esd.
<br><br>Peter. <br></div></div><br>