[Hudlug] SCO ...

[Charles Blackburn]

What is there to do??

By still distributing Linux on their own FTP servers, they are shooting themselves in the foot.

I don't think that they can prove that Linux has proprietary code in it w/o producing the code that is supposedly proprietary.

Its like me saying that Microsoft uses stolen code from me.. unless I can produce such evidence then i would have a chance. and even if they did and the code was changed just enough, then their patent/copyright/whatever holds no bounds. (imho)

charles

On Tue, 20 May 2003 12:25:28 +0100
Corrado Topi <c.topi@hud.ac.uk> wrote:

> Are we going to do anything about The SCO case?
> -- 
> Corrado Topi
> Lecturer in Information System
> - . -
> e-mail: c.topi@hud.ac.uk
> tel (direct): (+44) (0) 1484 47 3700
> -.-
> Room CW 2.15b
> School of Computing and Engineering (Canalside West)
> University Of Huddersfield
> -.-
> Do you know we are starting a research group on Open Source?
> Interested? www.opensource.tuxfamily.org!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hudlug mailing list
> Hudlug@mailman.lug.org.uk  Questions to:
> hudlug-owner@mailman.lug.org.uk
> http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hudlug
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, the e-mail address in the header is valid, however you must 
remove the words "REMOVETHIS" and "ANDTHIS" for it to go anywhere.

My actions are my own and I dont speak for anyone else.