<span class="gmail_quote">On 1/16/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Margot</b> <<a href="mailto:margot@lawrence1961.f9.co.uk">margot@lawrence1961.f9.co.uk</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top: 0; margin-right: 0; margin-bottom: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-left: 0.80ex; border-left-color: #cccccc; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex">
MacGyveR wrote:<br>> On Tuesday 15 Jan 2008, Margot wrote:<br>>> MacGyveR wrote:<br>>>> Without being shot down in flames, can i propose a policy:<br>>>><br>>>> Any off topic should be marked with a subject beginning with "OT" or
<br>>>> similar.<br><br><font color="#ff0000">Please note I put OT in my initial post of the Bill Gates YouTube video, which I think started the whole debate/argument/discussion (delete as appropriate) :-)</font>
<br><br><br>There's <a href="mailto:klug-coord@mailman.lug.org.uk">klug-coord@mailman.lug.org.uk</a> - supposedly used only for<br>discussions on organising the KLUG roadshow events, so presumably<br>anything to do with organising roadshows would be off-topic for this
<br>General Topics list.<br><br>Should we set up more specialist lists? </blockquote><div><br><font color="#ff0000">That is a good idea, but probably not needed for this group as could cause problems with people missing out on information or discussions of not signed up to the correct list.
<br>A prefix of OT and JOB should be good enough. Other prefixes like MEETING, VIRTUAL and SOCIAL may also make it easier for people to spot</font><font color="#ff0000"> topics they are interested in.<br><br>Colin<br></font>
<br> </div><br><br>