Hi all,<br>I'm happy to lend a hand with any web stuff either, system or content wise.<br><br>Is this a topic for discussion at the next meeting? <br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Nathan.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Mike Evans <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@tandem.f9.co.uk">mike@tandem.f9.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
<br>
Dan Attwood wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> As it stands we now have the static site which is notrhing if not secure<br>
><br>
> Dan<br>
><br>
</div>Thanks for the summary Dan. Yup - there ain't no way anyone is hacking<br>
our current site (Although frankly it's only as good as people's ssh<br>
passwords! Perhaps something else for discussion.) but it's not exactly<br>
exciting is it? And it relies on Colin being a) awake, b) prepared to<br>
carry on coding HTML more or less by hand.<br>
<br>
I'm officially sysadmin for the server - but frankly that's only because<br>
I didn't step back fast enough. I do have a long a chequered IT career,<br>
which makes me naturally suspicious of things shiny and new - which is<br>
possibly another good qualification for the job. However my hands-on<br>
experience is pretty out of date. What's more a number of people are in<br>
the sudoers file with full access - so they can step in at any time.<br>
<br>
So the idea was to have a bit of a debate about what to do next and see<br>
if we can come to some sort of agreement.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Mike<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Kent mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Kent@mailman.lug.org.uk">Kent@mailman.lug.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>