<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Hi Peter<br><br>You say,<br><br>"I'm currently looking at options to lose one of the NATs but everyone<br> I look at means I lose something."<br><br>without defining something....?<br><pre>"I could combine the two but it does<br>not solve the problem."<br><br>without defining the problem....?<br><br>A demilitarised zone can be setup on a single multiported ipcop, smoothwall, or similar firewall box<br><br>You just need three network cards/ports - one of which can be demilitarised/wireless network <br><br>[usb wifi, I think will work] <br><br>or use the dm port to hang a wireless router on<br><br>This shouldn't be a problem for any voip setup<br><br>You may need a X100P-SE FXO card, if you haven't got one, about £20 from ebay<br><br>see <font style="font-size: 10pt;" size="2">http://vimeo.com/1396948</font><br><br>some proprietary routers [<em>WRT54G</em>] have stun server built in, I believe<br><br> - its a sort of un-mangler for the packets<br><br>good luck<br><br>Aitch<br><br>========================================<br></pre><br><br>> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:59:08 +0100<br>> From: peterachilds@gmail.com<br>> To: kent@mailman.lug.org.uk<br>> Subject: Re: [Klug-general] Asterisk - good or bad?<br>> <br>> 2009/9/9 nic dan <dungeons88@hotmail.com>:<br>> > Hi paully - I'm a bit late to the party, as I see you have plenty of replies<br>> > Something else to look at, which is apparently easier to setup is, trixbox<br>> ><br>> > http://www.trixbox.org/<br>> ><br>> > videosetup guide<br>> ><br>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILrp8cm1pec<br>> ><br>> > IPV6 seems to cure the jitters<br>> ><br>> > http://www.ipv6.com/articles/voip/VOIP-IPV6.htm<br>> ><br>> > I'm also considering this and BE with a static IP, so I'll be interested in<br>> > how you get on<br>> ><br>> > That double NAT network setup sounds awkward/cumbersome - is it really<br>> > necessary?<br>> ><br>> > Wouldn't a STUN setup be better?<br>> ><br>> > http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/STUN<br>> ><br>> > What do the experts think?<br>> ><br>> <br>> I can't work out how to get STUN to work on my Be box.<br>> <br>> I'm currently looking at options to lose one of the NATs but everyone<br>> I look at means I lose something. The bit between the two Nats is a<br>> silly demilitarized zone, with a wifi network running in it (and two<br>> computers one for In Bound stuff and one for outbound. (Not that<br>> anyone except the Boss uses that) I could combine the two but it does<br>> not solve the problem.<br>> <br>> Peter.<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Kent mailing list<br>> Kent@mailman.lug.org.uk<br>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/kent<br><br /><hr />Add other email accounts to Hotmail in 3 easy steps. <a href='http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/167688463/direct/01/' target='_new'>Find out how.</a></body>
</html>