<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 March 2011 08:55, Dan Attwood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danattwood@gmail.com">danattwood@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"><br>
<br>
My proposition is thus: We have a series of monthly meetings for a
local areas, then the roaming KLUG, a great idea, will continue
hopping between what, with regularity, should become assured venues.
Community driven items being at both levels, whilst reserving guest
talks, special visits, and the like for the roaming meetings.<br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><div>I'm not sure how that would help. We complain about people not stepping forward with venues, talks and general help and you propose a whole heap of extra meetings. Why would the local ones be any different? </div>
</div>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I never really suggested more meets but suggested that if people wanted social local meets then they could organise them but not to count it unsuccessful if only 2 or 3 turned up and had a pint in the local pub. If more turn up then fine, Anyway pub meets fall over if there is much more than a few anyway....</div>
<div><br></div><div>Basically don't go out of your way to go and don't be surprised if its cancelled at very short notice..... </div><div><br></div><div>Peter. </div></div>