[Lancaster] Twitter

Ken Hough kenhough at btinternet.com
Sat Feb 21 15:33:38 UTC 2009


On Saturday 21 February 2009 15:00:34 Richard Robinson wrote:

<snip>

> And I suggest that that isn't always, necessarily, so. Ghandi, Stallman,
> whoever, could equally well be presented as working in their own
> self-interest as well as to others' benefit - the interesting point about
> them then being that they managed to find their way to an understanding of
> their interest that offered gains to other eople rather than the loss Ken
> seems to assume is inevitable.

Where did I say that 'loss' was inevitable?

I tried to argue that powerful interests could produce gains for many, but 
that not all would be pleased with the results or the means used.

I daresay that we could we could go on and on and on .....................

I've said my bit.

Ken Hough



More information about the Lancaster mailing list