[Liverpool] Group Future (Was: Places To Drink)

[Andrew Williams]

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:14:58PM +0100, Dan Lynch wrote:
> Yeah I can see what you mean, perhaps the name doesn't fully reflect what
> we're actually doing these days. I'm all for bringing new people in and
> expanding the group, I've tried to talk a few more people into coming and
> sometimes they're scared off by what they perceive Linux geeks as, elitist
> and unfriendly. I don't think that's a fair representation of us. There are
> a few individuals like that but generally we're approachable people I like
> to think. It does still seem to be the common image even amongst other tech
> circles though. A name change could help build a new image but I can't help
> thinking it will fracture the current group. I know many people will want to
> keep the LUG name and that's understandable.
> 
> What does everyone else think?

I think I should of discussed the idea to you first and get you to 
write it down for me, you've explained it alot better than I did :)

It's just something to put out there, I hope that discussion of the 
topic won't fracture the group, it's just something to consider.

-- 
Andrew Williams
w: http://tensixtyone.com/
e: andy at tensixtyone.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/liverpool/attachments/20090508/d63cdca7/attachment.pgp