[Liverpool] New FSFE Free PDF Readers Campaign

[Bob Ham]

On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 19:34 +0100, Sebastian wrote:
> 
> On 09/16/2010 06:40 PM, Bob Ham wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 17:16 +0100, Sebastian wrote:
> >
> >> I thought there was enough room for all of us - commercial,
> >> non-commercial, proprietary and open.
> >
> > Proprietary software is unethical.
> 
> Is it? Hmm, I'm all ears.

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html

-- 
Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>

for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/liverpool/attachments/20100916/d947e54d/attachment.pgp>