[Liverpool] Wed 6th Meeting

[Bob Ham]

OK, it looks like we're heading toward Adrian + Administative Meeting.
Sebastian gets another reprieve ;-)  I'll send the announcement.  And
put together an agenda :-)

On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 15:27 +0100, Adrian McEwen wrote:
> Yeah, 15 mins should be about right for my talk.  Obviously everyone
> will want to sign up and get involved immediately, but I'll try some
> sort of Google-style invite limiting system to build buzz and reduce
> the over-run in time... ;-)
> 
> Adrian.
> 
> On 04/07/11 12:06, Dan Lynch wrote: 
> > I don't mind. We definitely need to have this discussion about
> > future direction and housekeeping stuff for LivLUG. I assumed we'd
> > do that afterwards at the pub but thinking about it now we may be
> > better off doing it at LSC. It gets noisy in the pub, people tend to
> > get into their own separate conversations. It should probably be on
> > the agenda for LSC, if we have one.
> > 
> > How long do you think you'd be talking for Adrian? I thought it
> > would be more of a quick pitch thing, 15mins. 
> > 
> > If Sebastian has prepared stuff and planned to do an Asterisk demo
> > this month that's different, I don't want him to feel there's wasted
> > effort. Besides, I want to see it! If on the other hand it was more
> > of an afterthought then perhaps pushing it back to next month and
> > giving it a full session is a good idea.
> > 
> > It's up to you guys really, depends how you both feel. That was
> > helpful wasn't it? Hehehehe
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Adrian McEwen <adrian at mcqn.net>
> > wrote:
> >         Morning,
> >         
> >         It would be good to fill you all in with what we're up to
> >         with DoES Liverpool at some point, but happy to run it next
> >         month if we'd rather?  I haven't prepared anything as such,
> >         but was probably going to just tweak the slides that John
> >         McKerrell used when he talked about it at GeekUp last week.
> >         
> >         Are we having a "future of LivLUG" discussion this month?
> >          If so it might make more sense for me to talk this month,
> >         because it's not a particularly long talk, and then we'd
> >         save a full session for Sebastian?
> >         
> >         Cheers,
> >         
> >         Adrian. 
> >         
> >         
> >         On 04/07/11 09:18, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
> >                 I can do the second part of the Asterisk talk (well,
> >                 more of a hands-on session this one, really) - but
> >                 I'm equally happy to wait until next month if Adrian
> >                 has stuff prepared.
> >                 
> >                 Sebastian
> >                 
> >                 
> >                 On 04/07/11 01:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >                         Dan Lynch <biglynchy at gmail.com> wrote:
> >                         
> >                            Hi,
> >                         
> >                            Just wanted to check what's happening
> >                         with the meeting this
> >                            Wednesday. Do we have any plans? I
> >                         presume we go to the social
> >                            centre as usual and then on somewhere
> >                         else. Is there any talk
> >                            planned or anything?
> >                         
> >                            Adrian has been doing some interesting
> >                         stuff lately creating a hack
> >                            space in Liverpool and bringing techy
> >                         types together. It's all
> >                            moving forward. Maybe we could get him to
> >                         fill us in on that?
> >                            Probably not a full length talk, just
> >                         something to give us the gist.
> >                            He mentioned something about it today and
> >                         I decided to volunteer
> >                            him, he seems ok with it.
> >                         
> >                            What does everyone think?
> >                         
> >                            Dan
> >                         
> >                         
> >                         Is Seb continuing his Asterisk talk?
> >                         
> >                         
> >                         
> >                         _______________________________________________
> >                         Liverpool mailing list
> >                         Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> >                         https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >                 
> >                 _______________________________________________
> >                 Liverpool mailing list
> >                 Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> >                 https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >         
> >         
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Liverpool mailing list
> >         Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> >         https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> >         
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Liverpool mailing list
> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Liverpool mailing list
> Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool

-- 
Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>

for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/liverpool/attachments/20110704/2cd5f93b/attachment-0001.pgp>