[Liverpool] Wed 6th Meeting

[Sebastian Arcus]

I'm all good either way. It all needs to be done anyway - one month up 
or down for the Asterisk talk can't make much of a difference.

Sebastian


On 04/07/11 16:07, Dan Lynch wrote:
> Sounds good to me, nice work Bob.
>
> Dan
>
> On Jul 4, 2011 4:06 PM, "Bob Ham" <rah at bash.sh> wrote:
>  > OK, it looks like we're heading toward Adrian + Administative Meeting.
>  > Sebastian gets another reprieve ;-) I'll send the announcement. And
>  > put together an agenda :-)
>  >
>  > On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 15:27 +0100, Adrian McEwen wrote:
>  >> Yeah, 15 mins should be about right for my talk. Obviously everyone
>  >> will want to sign up and get involved immediately, but I'll try some
>  >> sort of Google-style invite limiting system to build buzz and reduce
>  >> the over-run in time... ;-)
>  >>
>  >> Adrian.
>  >>
>  >> On 04/07/11 12:06, Dan Lynch wrote:
>  >> > I don't mind. We definitely need to have this discussion about
>  >> > future direction and housekeeping stuff for LivLUG. I assumed we'd
>  >> > do that afterwards at the pub but thinking about it now we may be
>  >> > better off doing it at LSC. It gets noisy in the pub, people tend to
>  >> > get into their own separate conversations. It should probably be on
>  >> > the agenda for LSC, if we have one.
>  >> >
>  >> > How long do you think you'd be talking for Adrian? I thought it
>  >> > would be more of a quick pitch thing, 15mins.
>  >> >
>  >> > If Sebastian has prepared stuff and planned to do an Asterisk demo
>  >> > this month that's different, I don't want him to feel there's wasted
>  >> > effort. Besides, I want to see it! If on the other hand it was more
>  >> > of an afterthought then perhaps pushing it back to next month and
>  >> > giving it a full session is a good idea.
>  >> >
>  >> > It's up to you guys really, depends how you both feel. That was
>  >> > helpful wasn't it? Hehehehe
>  >> >
>  >> > Dan
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Adrian McEwen <adrian at mcqn.net
> <mailto:adrian at mcqn.net>>
>  >> > wrote:
>  >> > Morning,
>  >> >
>  >> > It would be good to fill you all in with what we're up to
>  >> > with DoES Liverpool at some point, but happy to run it next
>  >> > month if we'd rather? I haven't prepared anything as such,
>  >> > but was probably going to just tweak the slides that John
>  >> > McKerrell used when he talked about it at GeekUp last week.
>  >> >
>  >> > Are we having a "future of LivLUG" discussion this month?
>  >> > If so it might make more sense for me to talk this month,
>  >> > because it's not a particularly long talk, and then we'd
>  >> > save a full session for Sebastian?
>  >> >
>  >> > Cheers,
>  >> >
>  >> > Adrian.
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > On 04/07/11 09:18, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>  >> > I can do the second part of the Asterisk talk (well,
>  >> > more of a hands-on session this one, really) - but
>  >> > I'm equally happy to wait until next month if Adrian
>  >> > has stuff prepared.
>  >> >
>  >> > Sebastian
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > On 04/07/11 01:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>  >> > Dan Lynch <biglynchy at gmail.com <mailto:biglynchy at gmail.com>> wrote:
>  >> >
>  >> > Hi,
>  >> >
>  >> > Just wanted to check what's happening
>  >> > with the meeting this
>  >> > Wednesday. Do we have any plans? I
>  >> > presume we go to the social
>  >> > centre as usual and then on somewhere
>  >> > else. Is there any talk
>  >> > planned or anything?
>  >> >
>  >> > Adrian has been doing some interesting
>  >> > stuff lately creating a hack
>  >> > space in Liverpool and bringing techy
>  >> > types together. It's all
>  >> > moving forward. Maybe we could get him to
>  >> > fill us in on that?
>  >> > Probably not a full length talk, just
>  >> > something to give us the gist.
>  >> > He mentioned something about it today and
>  >> > I decided to volunteer
>  >> > him, he seems ok with it.
>  >> >
>  >> > What does everyone think?
>  >> >
>  >> > Dan
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > Is Seb continuing his Asterisk talk?
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > _______________________________________________
>  >> > Liverpool mailing list
>  >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>  >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
>  >> >
>  >> > _______________________________________________
>  >> > Liverpool mailing list
>  >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>  >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > _______________________________________________
>  >> > Liverpool mailing list
>  >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>  >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > _______________________________________________
>  >> > Liverpool mailing list
>  >> > Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>  >> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
>  >>
>  >> _______________________________________________
>  >> Liverpool mailing list
>  >> Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk <mailto:Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>  >> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool
>  >
>  > --
>  > Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>
>  >
>  > for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Liverpool mailing list
> Liverpool at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool