I missed it. Thanks very much.<div><br></div><div>If the claims of this paper are verified this is an extremely significant development in complexity theory.</div><div><br></div><div>It also appears that the paper isn't a "trick proof." Such a proof is one that use a tiny trick to get the result required but gives no real insight in to any issues surrounding the problem.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Skimming the paper, it seems that significant understanding of the problem (and why it exists) has been obtained. <br><br></div><div>I, of course, say this as an arm-chair mathematician. :)</div><div><br>
</div><div>Simon</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 August 2010 12:13, Bob Ham <span dir="ltr"><rah@bash.sh></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
In case anybody missed it..<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/35539144/pnp12pt" target="_blank">http://www.scribd.com/doc/35539144/pnp12pt</a><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Bob Ham <rah@bash.sh><br>
<br>
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Liverpool mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Liverpool@mailman.lug.org.uk">Liverpool@mailman.lug.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>