(sorry for the multiple posting)<div><br></div><div>Yep Neil, Nokia are contractually obligated to release a MeeGo phone (it was originally supposed to have happened by Q4 2010, lol). But I'm wondering whether this would be construed as fulfilling that agreement, since this isn't actually MeeGo.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 June 2011 01:15, Neil Bothwick <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:neil@stfw.net">neil@stfw.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:05:23 +0100, Dan Lynch wrote:<br>
<br>
> Very strange after their recent declaration that it was Windows Mobile<br>
> all the way. I might try out the N9 as I liked Maemo a lot. I can't see<br>
> it tempting me away from Android now though. That ship has sailed.<br>
> Let's not forget that Nokia launched the N900 and we all got excited<br>
> but then dumped it a month later in a hissy fit. I don't know if I'd<br>
> ever trust them again.<br>
<br>
</div>ISTR reading somewhere that Nokia have a contractual obligation to<br>
release a Meego phone. If that's the case, expect this to be supported for<br>
almost as long as the N900 was.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Neil Bothwick<br>
<br>
Maths and alcohol don't mix. Don't drink and derive.<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Liverpool mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Liverpool@mailman.lug.org.uk">Liverpool@mailman.lug.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/liverpool</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>