[Malvern] Choices.

[Richard Forster]

vi / emacs
oss / alsa
Option "XkbOptions" "ctrl:nocaps" / # Option "XkbOptions" "ctrl:nocaps"
LC_TIME="en_GB.UTF-8" / LC_TIME="en_DK.utf8"
bash / csh / tsh / $CONSONANTsh / ash
multiple panel(taskbar or whatever it's called) / single panel
autohide panel / non autohide panel
alias rm='rm -i' / no such entry in .bashrc
id:3:initdefault: / id:5:initdefault:
and for a laugh...
http://www.brainhz.com/underhanded/ vs http://www.ioccc.org/


I don't think question 4 and 5 from Geoff's list are mutually exclusive.

I can't think of a single compelling reason for running a 2.4 kernel 
right now, other than not wanting to change a perfectly functional server.

Cheers

Rick


Geoff Bagley wrote:
> Hi gang.
> 
> I have been looking at the choices on offer with Debian GNU/Linux.
> 
> 1.   Sarge / Etch
> 2.    2.4 / 2.6 kernel.
> 3.    LILO / GRUB.
> 4.   XFree86 / Xorg.
> 5.   X11R6 / X11R7
> 6.   Gnome / KDE / XFce.
> 
> Have I missed any ?
> 
> Phil - I understand that you often use XFce.
> Please let me have your ideas on whether it has any knock-on effects on
> setting up  applications intended for other desktops, or anything else.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Geoff.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Malvern mailing list
> Malvern at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/malvern
> 
>