[Nottingham] Voting

[Michael Erskine]

On Thursday 21 July 2005 00:29, Michael Simms wrote:
> Maybe, however I dont consider having to trawl through the mailing list
> and pick out who was standing who had seconded them as a 'list of who is
> standing' - unless I missed a list previously, but I don't think I did.

We should have had a webpage listing those standing.

> I also had expected at least time enough to allow everyone to vote.
> Personally I feel that a window of just over 4 hours is a joke. 

True, we should have given more time... and had a webpage properly describing 
the voting process.

> As I said in my last email, I dont consider it 'underhanded' or
> anything, just terribly timed and very unfair for the vast majority of
> LUG members.

We had to get everything done by the AGM last night. Those who attended were 
able to cast their vote at the AGM. 

I wonder if there's any way we can hold the election again - or just count the 
votes differently like the Americans :)

Regards,
Michael Erskine

-- 
BOFH excuse #309:

firewall needs cooling

		
___________________________________________________________ 
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday 
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com