Well, I suppose default settings on spam related settings may differ from a standard google email account... have a look at that<br clear="all"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><font size="1"><font color="#888888">----------------------------------------------------------------</font></font><br>
<font size="1"><font color="#888888">This email and any attachment(s) are for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s), and may contain confidential, or otherwise priviledged, information, and unauthorised use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email erroneously, please notify the sender immediately, and delete this email and any attachment from the system. Although reasonable precautions have been taken, the sender accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the presence of an infection. </font></font><br>
<b><font size="1"><font color="#006600">Please consider the environment before printing this email.</font></font></b> </span><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:06 PM, David Aldred <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:davidaldred@gmail.com">davidaldred@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I've got messages 1 and 2 from Jason, both using GMail the web interface, and both straight into the inbox (no firtling about in my spam box or anything). Does that point the finger more clearly at Virginmedia?<div>
<br>
<div><br></div><div>( I would have to say I've had mixed experiences with VM; on the broadband/phone generally good, with some very good conversations; on mobile phones seriously awful - I'm no longer with Virgin Mobile having paid to break a contract, it was that bad.). </div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div><div><br></div></font></span><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">David Aldred</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 20 April 2012 14:00, Jason Irwin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jasonirwin73@gmail.com" target="_blank">jasonirwin73@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On 20/04/12 13:43, David Aldred wrote:<br>
</div><div>> I may be being thick, but do the three characters concerned actually<br>
> meanr anything dodgy, to which Google/VM might be reacting?<br>
</div>Naw "<a href="http://ml1.co.uk" target="_blank">ml1.co.uk</a>" is hardly controversial. I think someone is using an<br>
<div>over aggressive spam-filter. Either because said domain looks generated<br>
(non dictionary, non trademark) or some scrote has been doing a lot a of<br>
spamming with faked headers.<br>
<br>
</div>This is message #2, message #1 did not contain the offending domain as a<br>
<div>test. Apols to those who get a dupe (I do not see my own posts on the<br>
list, which is a fuggin' annoyance I wish Google would stop).<br>
<br>
--<br>
Jason Irwin<br>
<br>
</div><div><div>_______________________________________________<br>
Nottingham mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk" target="_blank">Nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Nottingham mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk">Nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham</a><br></blockquote></div><br>