<div dir="auto">I also prefer the first as well. Shorter is always better.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 23 Apr 2019, 16:45 Martin via Nottingham, <<a href="mailto:nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk">nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Folks,<br>
<br>
We're long overdue for a tidy-up and a revamp of our website...<br>
<br>
As part of that, we have the chance to use a dedicated domain name.<br>
<br>
So, what preferences are there for:<br>
<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.nlug.uk" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.nlug.uk</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.notlug.org.uk" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.notlug.org.uk</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.notlug.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.notlug.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
?<br>
<br>
<br>
One hint is that the last one there is a bit pricey compared to the<br>
others and so would warrant a small donation to keep live ;-)<br>
<br>
Another hint is that I much prefer short and simple ;-)<br>
<br>
Or does noone notice??!<br>
<br>
<br>
Comments welcomed :-)<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Martin<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Nottingham mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Nottingham@mailman.lug.org.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nottingham</a></blockquote></div>