<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
What about REST? I find its easier to work with than SOAP or RPC.<br><br>rayhan<br><br>> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:12:16 +0100<br>> From: david@codepoets.co.uk<br>> To: phpwm@mailman.lug.org.uk<br>> Subject: [Phpwm] SOAP/XMLRPC/ Web services question<br>> <br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>> Hash: SHA1<br>> <br>> Hi,<br>> <br>> I'm trying to be lazy and get someone else to answer this question<br>> without doing a quick and dirty demo... so here goes....<br>> <br>> A client needs a remotely callable API for 3rd parties to hook into. To<br>> me this means Soap or XMLRPC or perhaps SCA/SDO ...<br>> <br>> Anyway, I obviously need some form of authentication to take place (e.g.<br>> only authorised users can use it, and there can only be so many queries<br>> in a time period... etc etc)<br>> <br>> So... I've made the assumption that cookies/sessions "work as normal"<br>> when making xmlrpc/soap calls? Is the same also true for SDO stuff?<br>> <br>> Any thoughts as to one being better than another ? (soap vs xmlrpc vs SDO).<br>> <br>> thanks<br>> David.<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> - --<br>> David Goodwin<br>> <br>> [ david at codepoets dot co dot uk ]<br>> [ http://www.codepoets.co.uk ]<br>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)<br>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org<br>> <br>> iD8DBQFH8fxw/ISo3RF5V6YRAokzAKCEa9VqGgwAC8jtPqut8oo+Yk5sKgCfcU+b<br>> 2nNAhwuUxN2toYcbv9UNrPI=<br>> =D8jk<br>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Phpwm mailing list<br>> Phpwm@mailman.lug.org.uk<br>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/phpwm<br><br /><hr />In a rush? <a href='http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_realtime_042008' target='_new'>Get real-time answers with Windows Live Messenger.</a></body>
</html>