[SLUG] Geeklog. (was Apologies To All Members)

Al Girling al21 at firenet.uk.com
Wed Apr 30 11:05:01 BST 2003


On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:36:37 +0100
Jamie Adams wrote:

> All looks good to me.
> 
> Jamie
> 
> From: "Ian Eade
> 
> If anyone has any objections or issues regarding Geeklog then you better
> make them known now as we're getting close to the point of committing
> ourselves to the program
> 
> Assuming that Geeklog is to be used, if you have posted anything to Wikki
> you will have to post them again to Geeklog.

Hmm, I'm going to throw a cat among the pigeons here as I don't like the layout of the current geeklog design.  Sorry!

I was under the impression that CMS would be used to compliment the existing website by adding certain features.  Calenders etc.  Rather than turning the Slug site into yet another Slashdot style news site.  This style of site is just the sort of thing that makes me pass swiftly on to something more interesting and less eye watering! ;)  To me it's just a collection of little links.

Every one I've shown the site put together by Jamie has been impressed!  It's clear, simple to navigate, conveys it's message and looks welcoming and yet very professional.  To me, it's only fault was that it lacked a few features and Jamie didn't have sufficient time to keep it fully updated.

I'd like to see a Slug site much as we've been used to, but with the power provided by CMS to have the calenders etc .  I dislike the login stuff too.  I see it as shouting "Bugger off! Your not welcome unless you're one of us!"  Not my idea of the Linux/open source philosophy. ;)  I know anyone can sign up.  But doesn't that kind of make it irrelavant?  I think the site is better off without it!

I agree that we need to make it possible for everyone to be able to submit stuff.  But we have to be able to vet it before it goes live or we'll end up with Viagra and penis enlargment adverts etc on the site!  Those that we trust should have a way to submit stuff to remove some work from the webmaster.  This should be easy to do with a login page with an address not made public, but given to those regarded as trustworthy.  I've done this sort of thing myself with .ht access and found it works well.

Have the news thing if you wish, but to me that's covered by the mailing list and shouldn't be on the front page.  I can see that logging in here might be necessary to be able to track people making posts.  But keep it here.  I see no need for it elsewhere.

I like the poll it's light hearted and gives an idea of what people use and allows them to interact with the site.  But it shouldn't detract from the survey, which if used in conjunction with a screenshots page allows those who are just curious about linux to see what can be done with the hardware the group have.  ie.  You don't need a googlehz processor to run the latest distros.

A link to a map showing the venue of the meetings wouldn't go amiss either for those living outside scarborough.

I know my little website is total crap.  But how about links to Slug members sites, so people can get an idea of who we are?  Might shake off the geek image of all being pale pasty nerds terrified of sunlight! ;)

I'm sorry to be negative, and I do appreciate the hard work people (particularly Ian and Paul) have put in to get this going.  But I feel the site is going in the wrong direction.  I'm probably in a minority of one here.  But you asked for opinions. ;)

Al

-- 
Mandrake 9
Fluxbox 0.1.14
Kernal 2.4.19-16mdk           Registered Linux User: 290080





More information about the Scarborough mailing list