<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffcc" text="#000066">
Matthew Toseland wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:200806121340.41257.toad@amphibian.dyndns.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Monday 09 June 2008 19:24, Fintan Gaughan wrote:
</pre>
<pre wrap=""><!----><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_file_systems&oldid=209063556#Features">http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_file_systems&oldid=209063556#Features</a>
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">See right hand column
Bad eh!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Seems a little unfair... maybe you should "fix" it? Hans Reiser was convicted
of murdering his wife, there is some controversy over it, namesys inc
(reiserfs' sponsor company) doesn't seem to be capable of functioning without
him, so reiserfs is in some trouble. However it's still an interesting
filesystem, so maybe some folk will continue to develop it... reiser4 might
even get into the kernel some time this decade... :)
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Fintan
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
On the topic of filesystems, it seems like there's a huge number of
them out there! Can anyone point to a simplified version of the info on
the wiki page? I tend to just plumb for ext 3 when formatting but
should I be considering other filesystems?<br>
</body>
</html>