[Sussex] Raid install

Dave Chapman linux-lists at ntlworld.com
Sat Sep 10 10:44:00 UTC 2005


On Saturday 10 September 2005 10:57, Stephen Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 06:00 +0100, Steve Dobson wrote:
> > Dave
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:18:06PM +0100, Dave Chapman wrote:
> > > Are there any caveats for installing to a raid0 partition.
> > > I believe that I will need a /boot and swap on a non raid drive.
> >
> > You are correct.  The /boot partition (where your kernel lives)
> > needs to be on a non-raid partition as the boot loader (grub
> > lilo) that is installed in you MBR one the boot partition is not
> > raid aware.
>
> Alternatively, if you're only planning to use 2 disks in an array, you
> can create an identical partition on each disk, set each type as linux
> (83), use the partition on the first disk in the array as a standard
> linux /boot partition, and set your BIOS to boot from the RAID device.
> Any other partitions can be set to linux raid autodetect and used to
> create the necessary RAID arrays.
>
> > I'm not sure about this but I think swap can be on any device.
> > The problem with running software raid is the the raid device
> > must be set up before swap is mounted - much easier to make
> > swap a native disk partition.
>
> I run swap on RAID 1 arrays without a problem. If you compile MD support
> into the kernel, the arrays are created automatically by the kernel and
> are ready to go by the time swap is initialised.
>
> > > I'm not too bothered if the system crashes if a hard drive
> > > fails thats why I have not mirrored the drives Just as long
> > > as my /home survives. So thats on /dev/hdb
>
> That's fine, but your system is at risk if either of the RAID 0 drives
> fails. Effectively you have double the chance of a fatal disk error
> occurring. I'd seriously think about using RAID 1 arrays here. If you
> follow the setup above, you can copy the contents of /boot on RAID disk
> 0 to RAID disk 1, and use grub to setup the MBR of RAID disk 1 as well.
> This means that in the event of a RAID disk 0 failure, you can set your
> RAID disk 1 to be the boot disk and carry on as before. The advantage of
> this is that when you get a new replacement disk, you can sync the new
> disk to the existing one using the RAID controller's built in management
> system.
>
> > Well a hard drive crash may happen to any disk.  If it happens
> > to your /dev/hdb then you will loss your /home partition anyway.
> >
> > If you were to mirror and mount /home on the mirrored partition
> > then in order to lose /home *ALL* disks in the mirror would
> > have to fail.
>
> Yup, I recommend RAID 1 for /home too.
There's a chance I can get a compaq cage to take 5x 9.1GB disc's so a raid 5 
setup for /home would be good yes ?
This would depend on how much fan noise and disc spin noise it generates as to 
how acceptable to the wife it is.

And partion /dev/hda with
hda1= /windows/XP
hda2= /boot
hda3= /windows/fat

Thanks
Dave




More information about the Sussex mailing list