[Sussex] Why Linux doesn't need defrag

Andrew Guard andrew at andrewguard.com
Mon Aug 21 18:32:23 UTC 2006


linux at oneandoneis2.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> It's one of those questions that comes up quite often, and most people 
> don't seem to get an answer more satisfactory than "Linux is better and 
> doesn't fragment"
> 
> http://geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/index.php/2006/08/17/why_doesn_t_linux_need_defragmenting 

Just bumped using StumbleUpon.

Well here what people are saying about it.

http://www.stumbleupon.com/url/geekblog.oneandoneis2.org/index.php/2006/08/17/why_doesn_t_linux_need_defragmenting

-- 

C.R.A.P. formally know as DRM
Cancellation, Restriction, and Punishment
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/8080

http://www.defectivebydesign.org/






More information about the Sussex mailing list