[Sussex] Command Line script, be it a GPL v3 or CC by-sa?

[Harry Rickards]

Personally I would use the GPL license, as Creative Commons is usually  
used for graphics and novels, etc.
Quoting Andrew Guard <andrew09 at andrewguard.com>:

> I have written a rather good Command Line script, that belive lot
> people will use.
>
> Now remember it not a executable but a Command Line script (batch
> file). Everything within the Command Line script is my own work. But
> it uses 1 executable command that written under GPLv3 without it not
> possible run.
>
> So should release it under a GPL v3 or Creative Commons
> Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales licence.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/uk/
>
> --
> Say no to SPYCOMS
> http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/ispphorm/
>
> __
> Sussex mailing list
> Sussex at mailman.lug.org.uk
> E-mail Address: sussex at mailman.lug.org.uk
> Sussex LUG Website: http://www.sussex.lug.org.uk/
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sussex
>



-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments