Is there something I'm missing here?

The port numbers is LESS detailed than IANA (which is, after all, the master 
copy).

For example, it doesn't list contact names/mail addresses. (This is, of course, 
a vanity thing for me - look at port UDP/3639 and TCP/3639) :-)

Regards,

Mark Harrison


Quoting Geoff Teale <Geoff.Teale@claybrook.co.uk>:

> Andrew wrote:
> -------------
> > I have just found this gem of an site, it list IP Ports number usages.
> 
> I find /etc/services functions very nicely in this respect :)
> 
> Actually the detail on this site is quite nice.
> 
> --
> geoff.teale@claybrook.co.uk
> tealeg@member.fsf.org
> 
> "make music like mercy that gives what it is and has nothing to prove"
>  - Ani DiFranco "Up Up Up Up Up Up"
> 
> 
> The above information is confidential to the addressee and may be privileged.
>  Unauthorised access and use is prohibited.
> 
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore this Company does not
> accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.
> 
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> and may be unlawful.
> 
> Claybrook Computing Limited is a subsidiary of Claybrook Computing (Holdings)
> Limited
> Registered Office: Abbey House. 282 Farnborough Road, Farnborough, Hampshire
> GU14 7NJ
> Registered in England and Wales No 1287205
> 
> A Hogg Robinson plc company
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sussex mailing list
> Sussex@mailman.lug.org.uk
> http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/sussex