<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 09/02/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">Nico Kadel-Garcia</b> <<a href="mailto:nkadel@gmail.com">nkadel@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Heh. They were heading down that path even before the lawsuits. I don't<br>suppose your office mates there have noticed any licenses for SCO 5.0.6<br>in the dumpsters, especially SMP and development licenses? I've got a<br>
box I'd like to set up as a protected development server for *ME* as<br>part of this "migration to Linux" project, to keep me away from anyone<br>else's work while I hammer out system issues, and would prefer not to<br>
spend the ridiculous licensinig fees for something I'll only use for a<br>few months.</blockquote><div><br><br>Well, I doubt it to be honest. The only noticeable activity of that office was to stick "you are parked in a SCO parking space, don't do it again" stickers on car windscreens when we were moving in - even though there are many, many more spaces than cars. We still have one of those notices in the office someplace :-)<br>
</div><br></div><br>-- <br>Geoff Teale<br><<a href="mailto:tealeg@member.fsf.org">tealeg@member.fsf.org</a>>