<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled-3</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/1164/2469.10tt74103107AAF1.php"><H3>Connect with Singles FREE this Weekend Only</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table id="Table_01" width="580" height="659" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<a href="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/1164/2469.10tt74103107AAF2.php">
<img src="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/74103107/1164.2469/img013734443.jpg" width="580" height="220" border="0" alt=""></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<a href="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/1164/2469.10tt74103107AAF3.php">
<img src="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/74103107/1164.2469/img113734443.jpg" width="580" height="401" border="0" alt=""></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<a href="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/1164/2469.10tt74103107AAF4.html">
<img src="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/74103107/1164.2469/img213734443.gif" width="580" height="38" border="0" alt=""></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for swlugevents@mailman.lug.org.uk
<br />
<a href="http://www.rickofodr.us/u/2374/1164/2469/10/74103107/swlugevents@mailman.lug.org.uk" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.rickofodr.us/2374/137/344/74103107/1164.2469/img313734443.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">t see the cable, while an equal number
dont believe her testimony and actually think she was aware of it
(39 percent). Few -- 11 percent -- say its no big deal
that she didnt see the ambassadors request for help. Voters have mixed
views about how the White House is handling the situation: 46 percent
say the administration is covering up what happened. Almost as many --
43 percent -- say theres no cover up.Republicans (72 percent) are almost
three times as likely as Democrats (24 percent) to think there is
a cover up. Among independents, 46 percent feel the White House is
hiding what happened, while 39 percent do not. The administration eventually
acknowledged the attack in Benghazi was a planned terrorist attack. Early
on it pointed to a controversial online video sparking spontaneous violence.
Although Panetta and Clinton have testified, so far Congress hasnt heard
from the U.S. government personnel who survived the attack. By a 67-26
percent margin, voters think lawmakers should subpoena them if the State
Department and CIA dont volunteer to let the witnesses be interviewed by
Congressional investigators.The Fox News poll is based on landline and cell
phone interviews with 1,009 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide
and was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research
(D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from April 20 to April
22. The full poll has a margin of sampling error of plus
or minus three percentag
and 1,600 rounds per officer,
while the U.S. Army goes through roughly 350 rounds per soldier.He noted
that is "roughly 1,000 rounds more per person.""Their officers use what
seems to be an exorbitant amount of ammunition," he said.Nick Nayak, chief
procurement officer for the Department of Homeland Security, did not challenge
Chaffetz's numbers.However, Nayak sought to counter what he described as
several misconceptions about the bullet buys.Despite reports that the department
was trying to buy up to 1.6 billion rounds over five years,
he said that is not true. He later clarified that the number
is closer to 750 million.He said the department, on average, buys roughly
100 million rounds per year.He also said claims that the department is
stockpiling ammo are "simply not true." Further, he countered claims that
the purchases are helping create broader ammunition shortages in the U.S.The
department has long said it needs the bullets for agents in training
and on duty, and buys in bulk to save money.While Democrats likened
concerns about the purchases to conspiracy theories, Republicans raised
concern about the sheer cost of the ammunition."This is not about conspiracy
theories, this is about good government," Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said.Rep.
Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who chairs the full Oversight and Government Reform
Committee, said he suspects rounds are being stockpiled, and then either
"disposed of," passed to non-federal agencies, o
</p>
</html>