[Wolves] NT Dead?

s parkes wolves at mailman.lug.org.uk
Mon Mar 31 10:49:00 2003


>From: Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.freeserve.co.uk>
>Reply-To: wolves@mailman.lug.org.uk
>To: wolves@mailman.lug.org.uk
>Subject: Re: [Wolves] NT Dead?
>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:24:44 +0000 (GMT)
>
>On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, s parkes wrote:
>
> > The register is reporting that MS have declared NT unfit for fixing.
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/29985.html
> >
> > the architecture of NT is so poor that it is impossible to fix the 
>latest
> > exploit lol
>
>No, that's overstating it somewhat.  The article only mentions this issue
>affecting version 4, and in fact states that fixes exist for Windows NT 5
>and 5.1.
>
arn't those OS's normally refered to as win2k?

sparkes, pendanic as usual

_________________________________________________________________