[Wolves] Whence the ASCII armoured gpg signatures?

[Dave Morley]

On Mon, 05 Jan 2015 15:34:54 +0000
Peter Cannon <dick_turpin at archlinux.us> wrote:

> On 05/01/15 14:33, Alex Willmer wrote:
> > Iain and Ron,
> >
> > I just noticed you're both signing emails with MIME encoding, as
> > opposed to inline ASCII armoured (------BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE ....).
> > At a glance Ron switch around April last year, and Iain Sept 2013.
> >
> > Was this a conscious decision you made? If so what motivated it?
> > Do you do the same for all your emails? Or do you still sometimes
> > use ASCII armoured?
> >
> > Inquisitively, Alex
> >
> 
> Just so it's on record: I don't care either way. :-)
> 

I'm guessing at different plugin/email client, I know Ron went distro
hopping but would most likely install thunderbird so I assume a
change to the default plugin maybe? As for Iain well it's Iain it's
probably a php thing or again an evolution/thunderbird plugin change :)

-- 
You Make It, I'll Break It!

I Love My Job :)

http://www.canonical.com
http://www.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/wolves/attachments/20150105/e32281be/attachment.pgp>