<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/12/13 15:21, Andy Wootton wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:52B06BE1.4090702@gmail.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CAKqcuGL6we0zvKHb-BVFVk+AsmnL6UXe9in=QedjymPy==8GZw@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">On 16 December 2013 17:11, Chris
              Ellis <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:chris@intrbiz.com" target="_blank">chris@intrbiz.com</a>></span>
              wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div class="gmail_extra">Hi Wayne<br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_extra">
                    <div class="gmail_quote">
                      <div class="im"> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:04 PM,
                        Wayne <span dir="ltr"><<a
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:waynelists@machx.co.uk"
                            target="_blank">waynelists@machx.co.uk</a>></span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
                          0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                          solid;padding-left:1ex">Merry Xmas to all..<br>
                          <br>
                          what would you recommend for paid for and/or
                          free WYSIWYG html editor....<br>
                          <br>
                          I've got a copy of Dreamweaver and it just
                          seems a bit clunky...any other suggestions?<br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                      <div>IMHO since the advent of CSS WYSIWYG HTML
                        editors are next to worthless.<br>
                        <br>
                        The flexibility of styling that CSS provides
                        means there are no strict rendering rules for <br>
                        HTML as such the WYSIWYG editors need to be CSS
                        aware.  <br>
                        <br>
                        Every web developer I know writes the HTML and
                        CSS in a text editor.<br>
                      </div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>There aren't aren't many "good" ones out there for
                this reason, it's very easy to put together a site in
                CSS and HTML which doesn't tax you too much.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>It's worth having a look at the W3Schools website, it
                teaches a good working knowledge of CSS and it really
                doesn't take long to learn.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Have a look at Twitter-Bootstrap if you want a quick
                framework to work with. </div>
            </div>
            <br>
            <br clear="all">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            -- <br>
            <div dir="ltr">Kris Douglas MBCS<br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Disclaimer: I don't 'do' web pages but from a theoretical point of
      view, tagging languages came about from an attempt to seperate
      content, structure and presentation aspects of a piece of text,
      though they've often fallen short of that ideal. It's always been
      wrong-headed to worry about What-You-See because you can't
      possibly know how it is going to be rendered on the 5m high
      holographic device in zero-gravity. PDFs are much better at
      pretending to be the fixed-size piece of paper graphic artists
      really want but 'apparently' they're "too sensitive" to give a
      good slap. <br>
      <br>
      I've been looking for ages for a Free tool to start writing
      DocBook XML (or maybe DITA) and recently found 'XML Copy Editor'
      in the Ubuntu repo. It looks promising. It reads an XML definition
      and configures itself to be aware of the relevant grammar. <br>
      <br>
      I understand that HTML5 can be written in XHTML syntax so maybe
      this is viable option for web pages too? XML Copy Editor supports
      'XHTML 1.0 Strict' but I'm out of my depth now.<br>
      <br>
      Woo MBCS (Yikes, they're breeding!)<br>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    Maybe I should have looked at this first:
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML</a> No, XHTML 1.0 isn't good enough
    and XHTML5 seems to have been abandoned.<br>
  </body>
</html>