[Bradford] Uselessd - a replacement for systemd
David Parkin
david at davidparkin.com
Sun Sep 21 20:08:58 UTC 2014
Not quite sure about the bad in this. If we don't want systemd and the
distros do, we need a cut down version to replace it. Isn't this what
it's about?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Spencer <baildon.research at googlemail.com>
Cc: BradfordLinuxUserGroup <bradford at mailman.lug.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bradford] Uselessd - a replacement for systemd
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:43:04 +0100
> Hi all and especially David S
> http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/
Hum, well, ta for the linkie...
It looks like this is exactly the opposite of what would be useful :-(
It starts with the systemd-208 codebase, which is destined to be
widely regarded as a bad move [1].
As a FreeBSD project, it throws away all the Linux specific stuff --
including all the stuff that we need to have without its systemd
encapsulation (cgroups, udev/libudev, logind).
The only stuff it keeps is hideous objectionable stuff (process
management, declarative config, socket activation).
No wonder they call it uselessd :-(
-D.
[1] "In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of
people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move" --
hhgttg
_______________________________________________
Bradford mailing list
Bradford at mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bradford
More information about the Bradford
mailing list