From smedley358 at btinternet.com Sun Aug 12 20:11:44 2007 From: smedley358 at btinternet.com (Richard Smedley) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:11:44 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] [Fwd: [SC.LUG] [Announce] Next Cheshire meeting] Message-ID: <1186949744.4139.154.camel@GNU-Mac-II.bradwall> For those within striking distance of Macclesfield... -------- Forwarded Message -------- To: South Cheshire GNU Users Subject: [SC.LUG] [Announce] Next meeting -- was: Re: Getting Together Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:59:46 +0100 On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 10:11 +0100, Eddie Chapman wrote: > the other advantage of meeting in Macc is people without cars can get > the train, and Society Rooms is within easy walking distance of the > station. Right then, the next meeting seems to have been agreed :-) Date: Monday 20 August, 2007 Time: 19.00 - Informal Meeting 20.00 Lightening Talks (tbc) - all welcome to give short talks ;-) Location: The Society Rooms, Park Green Macclesfield Cheshire SK11 7NA Telephone: 01625 507320 Or MultiMap, etc. I still use an A-Z, myself ;-) See you there, - Richard From rcgibson at talktalk.net Wed Aug 22 15:37:43 2007 From: rcgibson at talktalk.net (Roger Gibson) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:37:43 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] SUSe 10.2 problem Message-ID: <46CC583D.8060409@talktalk.net> My friend Patrick has been running SUSE 10.2 for a while with no problems including the built-in automatic SUSE updater. However this auto-update has stopped working and he gets an error message Novell.Zenworks.Zmd.Public.ZenException: SQL logic error or missing database Server stack trace: Exception rethrown at [0]: at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke (System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy rp, IMessage msg, System.Exception& exc, System.Object[]& out_args) [0x00000] Thw manual updater works OK, it's just the auto-updater which causes problems. Has anyone any clues what might be happening? Many thanks - Roger Gibson From rcgibson at talktalk.net Wed Aug 22 21:55:31 2007 From: rcgibson at talktalk.net (Roger Gibson) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:55:31 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] See if I'm now a 'proper' person Message-ID: <46CCB0D2.2070406@talktalk.net> Thanks Les for adding me to the list again. I'll see if this email gets through the system without you having to give it a push past the censor - Roger From les.pritchard at gmail.com Wed Aug 22 22:20:43 2007 From: les.pritchard at gmail.com (Les Pritchard) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:20:43 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] See if I'm now a 'proper' person In-Reply-To: <46CCB0D2.2070406@talktalk.net> References: <46CCB0D2.2070406@talktalk.net> Message-ID: Yey! Well done - we've finally got you on the list!!! On 8/22/07, Roger Gibson wrote: > > Thanks Les for adding me to the list again. I'll see if this email gets > through the system without you having to give it a push past the censor > - Roger > > _______________________________________________ > Chester mailing list > Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuart.james.burns at gmail.com Thu Aug 23 21:34:47 2007 From: stuart.james.burns at gmail.com (Stuart Burns) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:34:47 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] Free - Anyone want a HP desktop Message-ID: Got a HP celeron 466 base unit if anyone wants it, otherwise its Mr HP, meet Mr Landfill! Let me know Regards Stu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From les.pritchard at gmail.com Sat Aug 25 13:03:58 2007 From: les.pritchard at gmail.com (Les Pritchard) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:03:58 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] August Meet and other info Message-ID: Hi everyone, Firstly a reminder that the next Chester LUG meet is being held next Thursday 30th in the Old King's Head as usual (7pm onward). Secondly, I am really happy to note that this meet will be the first birthday of the LUG! Yes it was a year ago that the first meet was held at the Old Harkers pub on August 31st. I was really pleased with the turnout at the time and the continued attendance of meets has made me even happier. Seeing the troubles other LUGs have had, it has been fantastic to have a good regular turnout to the meets. Thanks very much for all your participation so far. Here's a mini 'State of the LUG address' :-) So far, as I've said, we have had a successful run on LUG meets that I hope will continue. I know that there are quite a few people registered on this mailing list who do not attend the LUG due to distance or other personal factors. Thanks for being on the list anyway - I know that the mailing list is relatively quiet, but that should hopefully grow (think a lot of members prefer talking over a pint and not a keyboard!). We're a friendly bunch, so feel free to contribute anything to the mailing list; comments, opinions or questions (we may not have the answer - but we'll never flame you!). Now onto my ideas / plans for the near future: 1. The idea has come up in meets of organising days out to techie events or interesting attractions. I think this would be a great idea, so any suggestions of where we could go are most welcome. 2. Now that we have a good regular membership base, I'd like to look into some events like Install Fests, or similar 'bring along technology' events. Any potential venue suggestions would be great. 3. The website, yes I apologise for the tardy up keep of the website! It has been more of a placeholder recently. I have an alternative site in the works and with my life getting back on track, should have that up in the very near future. 4. Leading on from this, as part of the new website I'm planning on adding Wiki and Blogs sections. All members will be welcome to post to the blogs with their experiences, problems and opinions on anything Linux / Open Source. If you're interested in having a blog, get in contact with me. So thanks very much for all your contributions over the past year and I'm sure that the LUG can only get stronger. See you on Thursday! Les -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From les.pritchard at gmail.com Thu Aug 30 12:23:31 2007 From: les.pritchard at gmail.com (Les Pritchard) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:23:31 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] Reminder: Birthday Meet tonight! Message-ID: The Old King's Head from 7pm tonight. Hopefully see you there Les -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuart.james.burns at gmail.com Fri Aug 31 08:26:12 2007 From: stuart.james.burns at gmail.com (Stuart Burns) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:26:12 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] A theoretical question Message-ID: Ok, Its friday morning and we all know we are not in the mood for work, so I thought of an interesting question to debate: Suppose you were a researcher and you found a way to speed up all computer operations by 300%, irrespective of OS. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuart.james.burns at gmail.com Fri Aug 31 08:27:04 2007 From: stuart.james.burns at gmail.com (Stuart Burns) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:27:04 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] Try that again Message-ID: Ok, Its friday morning and we all know we are not in the mood for work, so I thought of an interesting question to debate: Suppose you were a researcher and you found a way to speed up all computer operations by 300%, irrespective of OS. Now we all realise the value of this. Old computers would become super fast again, and their life prolonged, and new ones would be insanely fast. However would you let MS use the technology, lock it into their systems and become a very rich person indeed or would you just GPL it and make linux become light years ahead of Windows, but be a poor person ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fgaughan at gmail.com Fri Aug 31 10:32:14 2007 From: fgaughan at gmail.com (Fintan Gaughan) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:32:14 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] Reminder: Birthday Meet tonight! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: How did it go last night? And guess what I am in Chester tonight for the weekend. I could be your furthest member? anyone further than North Yorkshire please wave :-) Fintan -- My Blog http://www.finllfixit.co.uk/ On 30/08/2007, Les Pritchard wrote: > The Old King's Head from 7pm tonight. > > Hopefully see you there > > Les > > _______________________________________________ > Chester mailing list > Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester > > From dh at iucr.org Fri Aug 31 10:41:02 2007 From: dh at iucr.org (David Holden) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:41:02 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] Try that again In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200708311140.11332.dh@iucr.org> On Friday 31 August 2007, Stuart Burns wrote: > Ok, Its friday morning and we all know we are not in the mood for work, so > I thought of an interesting question to debate: > > Suppose you were a researcher and you found a way to speed up all computer > operations by 300%, irrespective of OS. > > Now we all realise the value of this. Old computers would become super fast > again, and their life prolonged, and new ones would be insanely fast. > > However would you let MS use the technology, lock it into their systems and > become a very rich person indeed or would you just GPL it and make linux > become light years ahead of Windows, but be a poor person ? One approach. Get patent rights in all regions. Give open source OS's free unlimited lifetime licenses. At the same time license the technology to non free OS's for large amounts of cash. Best of both worlds.. Dave. -- Dr. David Holden. See: regarding Word or PowerPoint. GPG key available on request. ------------------------------------------------------------- From george at goatadsl.co.uk Fri Aug 31 19:52:43 2007 From: george at goatadsl.co.uk (George) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:52:43 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] Try that again In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <46D87143.3050508@goatadsl.co.uk> Stuart Burns wrote: > Now we all realise the value of this. Old computers would become super > fast again, and their life prolonged, and new ones would be insanely fast. You couldn't really use this to prolong the life of existing computers, it would almost certainly need an OS update and most people only do this when replacing the hardware. But I'm just being picky... > However would you let MS use the technology, lock it into their systems > and become a very rich person indeed or would you just GPL it and make > linux become light years ahead of Windows, but be a poor person ? I would give it to MS because in the UK at least there is no concept of software patents. This would mean I got the cash in the bank and someone else would be free to reverse engineer it for the benefit of OS software. Of course the poor people of the United States would be out of luck but I think I could live with that... Of course this is all academic, a hit man from Intel would kill you before you had chance to make use of the idea :) George From simonw at gbitsystems.co.uk Fri Aug 31 08:38:27 2007 From: simonw at gbitsystems.co.uk (Simon Willett) Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:38:27 -0000 Subject: [Chester LUG] Try that again In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070831083803.DC583236B8@gbitsystems.co.uk> Isn't that how it is already? _____ From: chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk [mailto:chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Stuart Burns Sent: 31 August 2007 09:27 To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk Subject: [Chester LUG] Try that again Ok, Its friday morning and we all know we are not in the mood for work, so I thought of an interesting question to debate: Suppose you were a researcher and you found a way to speed up all computer operations by 300%, irrespective of OS. Now we all realise the value of this. Old computers would become super fast again, and their life prolonged, and new ones would be insanely fast. However would you let MS use the technology, lock it into their systems and become a very rich person indeed or would you just GPL it and make linux become light years ahead of Windows, but be a poor person ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: