[Chester LUG] CCNA
Stephen Jones
stephenjones at g-b-a.co.uk
Wed Nov 10 12:54:13 UTC 2010
Hi Everyone,
My name is Stephen, I have joined the LUG a while ago however haven't attend
contributed anything sorry to say. I recently passed my CCNA via Yale in
Wrexham however IT was over two year period which cost me 350 pound per
year. Bargin! However the trade off is a long time commitment but on the
plus I didn't have to make any investment in equipment and then bundle it
off on ebay afterwards. They also offered believe until recently the Cisco
Wireless course too which was a doddle compare to the CCNA and only a year.
Regards
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk
[mailto:chester-bounces at mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of
chester-request at mailman.lug.org.uk
Sent: 02 November 2010 20:30
To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
Subject: Chester Digest, Vol 174, Issue 3
Send Chester mailing list submissions to
chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
chester-request at mailman.lug.org.uk
You can reach the person managing the list at
chester-owner at mailman.lug.org.uk
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Chester digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: ccna etc (Nev)
2. Re: ccna etc (Stuart Burns)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:04:36 +0000
From: Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Chester LUG] ccna etc
To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
Message-ID: <4CD06ED4.6030909 at nevstah.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
hiya
i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all.. just need
to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!
i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho. i'm sure
we could all get together and help each other pass!
ta
nev
On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
> Good stuff Nev.
>
> I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm
confident I can self study it all.
>
> If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up
at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
>
> I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have
a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
>
> Let me know.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike.
>
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>
wrote:
>
>> Nev
>>
>> Who did you do the ccna course with?
>>
>> Thomas.
>>
>> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
>>> hi mike
>>>
>>> thanks for the welcome
>>>
>>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
>>> manchester, manic to say the least!
>>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
>>>
>>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from
>>> the folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
>>>
>>> ta
>>>
>>> nev
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>>> Hi Nev,
>>>>
>>>> Welcome to the list :)
>>>>
>>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
>>>> confident, go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day
>>>> crash course with a lot of the material already covered.
>>>>
>>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train
>>>> Signal videos I have which are decent :)
>>>>
>>>> Let me know mate.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Mike.
>>>>
>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
>>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi mike
>>>>>
>>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>>>>
>>>>> nev
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on
>>>>>> networking fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart
>>>>>> Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is
>>>>>>> default, ie the WAN:)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>>>>> Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>>>>> own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hiya,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>>>>> from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>>>>> links are often malicious:
>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16>***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>>>>> cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route to push it out
>>>>>>>> the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>>>>> any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stuart
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
>>>>>> by ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>**,
>>>>>> and is
>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>> **
>>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>> *
>>>>> *
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>>>>> **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*, and is believed to
>>>>> be clean. ***
>>>>> **_______________________________________________****
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>> **
>>>> **
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>>>> *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be
>>>> clean. **
>>>> **
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>> **
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
>>> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:29:27 +0000
From: Stuart Burns <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Chester LUG] ccna etc
To: chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
Message-ID:
<AANLkTi=db0try8UsYy3r6=zkGDDha2G7fWem8=uSBWFX at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
If anyone is interested, I am (trying) to run the networking course again
before end of Jan. Taught by a pro lecturer. It's a basics and intermediate
day long hands on.
Cost would be less than ?100 each. Would prolly need 7 people or so.
Just putting it out there.
Stu
On 2 November 2010 20:04, Nev <nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
> hiya
>
> i did mine with commsupport and was really pleased with it all.. just need
> to practise lots till i'm ready for the exam!!
>
> i work in nantwich and also drive! i dont have any of the kit tho. i'm
sure
> we could all get together and help each other pass!
>
> ta
>
> nev
>
>
> On 02/11/2010 14:38, Michael Crilly wrote:
>
>> Good stuff Nev.
>>
>> I don't think I will do a course. I have a CCNA kit at home, so I'm
>> confident I can self study it all.
>>
>> If I had a car, I would suggest lugging the kit somewhere we can meet up
>> at so we can both mess around with it, but I don't have that luxury.
>>
>> I would be up for a meet up with you and Thomas to swap resources. I have
>> a CCNA set of books too which have Cisco videos on.
>>
>> Let me know.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Mike.
>>
>> On 2 Nov 2010, at 14:34, Thomas Prophett<thomas at thomasprophett.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Nev
>>>
>>> Who did you do the ccna course with?
>>>
>>> Thomas.
>>>
>>> On 2 November 2010 14:28, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi mike
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the welcome
>>>>
>>>> sorry for the slow reply. was on the ccna course all last week in
>>>> manchester, manic to say the least!
>>>> i just need to practise so i can take the exam now!!
>>>>
>>>> i've not heard of train signal before! i got a bunch of videos from the
>>>> folks i trained with, maybe a swap would be in order!
>>>>
>>>> ta
>>>>
>>>> nev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/10/10 11:26, Michael Crilly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Nev,
>>>>>
>>>>> Welcome to the list :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm self studying a large majority of the course and if I feel
>>>>> confident,
>>>>> go for the exams. If not, I'm going to do a five day crash course with
>>>>> a lot
>>>>> of the material already covered.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you fancy getting together, I can give you a copy of the Train
>>>>> Signal
>>>>> videos I have which are decent :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know mate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:55, Nev<nev at nevstah.co.uk
>>>>> <mailto:nev at nevstah.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> hi mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where are you doing ccna? and hows it going? I'm starting tomorrow!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 10:03, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hit it with a stick.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I need to sit down with you Stuart an pick your brains on networking
>>>>>>> fundamentals. I'm doing my CCNA at present.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Besides we aint seen each other for some time now :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 Oct 2010, at 09:50, Stuart Burns<stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agre but the problem is how do I tell it which gateway is
default,
>>>>>>>> ie
>>>>>>>> the WAN:)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23 October 2010 07:33, Michael Crilly<mrcrilly at googlemail.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:mrcrilly at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Isn't that done via the gateway IP you supply to each host?
>>>>>>>> Usually a router/switch that gets a packet/frame not in it's
>>>>>>>> own subnet will forward to the gateway no?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 22 Oct 2010, at 23:22, Stuart Burns
>>>>>>>> <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hiya,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is anyone really good with pfsense.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have a small pc to function as a pfsense router.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It has 3 interfaces - LAN,WAN,OPT
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The LAN is *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>>>>>>>> from "10.0.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>>>>>>>> links are often malicious: 10.0.0.0/16**<http://10.0.0.0/16>***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WAN is provided by DHCP
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The last interface is *MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>**MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be*
>>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***MailScanner has detected a possible
>>>>>>>>> fraud attempt from "172.16.0.0" claiming to be *MailScanner
>>>>>>>>> warning: numerical links are often malicious: 172.16.0.0/24**
>>>>>>>>> <http://172.16.0.0/24>***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now I can get all the routes talking to each other. However I
>>>>>>>>> cant get the 172.16.0.0 to use a default route to push it out
>>>>>>>>> the DHCP assigned WAN interface. I cant see anywhere to say
>>>>>>>>> any traffic with no explicit route, route via WAN.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyone know if its even possible ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Stuart
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>>> dangerous content by ***MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/
>>>>>>> >**,
>>>>>>> and is
>>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *_______________________________________________**
>>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>>> dangerous content by **MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>*,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> believed to be clean. ***
>>>>>> **_______________________________________________****
>>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk<mailto:Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk>
>>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>>> **
>>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>> --
>>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner*<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>>> is
>>>>> believed to be clean. **
>>>>> **
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Chester mailing list
>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>
>>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20101102/42a64557/a
ttachment.htm>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Chester mailing list
Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
End of Chester Digest, Vol 174, Issue 3
***************************************
More information about the Chester
mailing list