[Chester LUG] An idea
Stuart Burns
stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 11:17:53 UTC 2014
No, I am being serious! Wordpress is not my thing at all. Maybe I need an
ansible refresher. We don't all use it all day mate!
On 8 December 2014 at 11:13, Michael Crilly <michael at mcrilly.me> wrote:
> Cryptography is hard to get right. The best solution is to generate a
> password protected 4096 bit RSA key and publish the finger print to a
> Twitter account people know you by. Facebook also works. That way, people
> and verify a finger print is yours based on your Tweet/Facebook. Obviously
> then publish the public key to pgp.mit.edu and you’re done. Don’t try and
> invent your own scheme.
>
> Vagrant + Ansible, my friend. I think you’re trolling me now. Has someone
> let you use a computer drunk? :P
>
>
> On 8 Dec 2014, at 11:07, Stuart Burns <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> ok loldogs or whatever is this year.
>
> Anyhow, I need some assistance and I think you may know a bit of stuff ;)
>
> I have a new wordpress setup and I want to be able to mess around on my
> local machine (ie dev) and then publish to the web. Any ideas ?
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 11:03, Michael Crilly <michael at mcrilly.me> wrote:
>
>> Lolcats? What year is it again? ;-)
>>
>> On 8 December 2014 10:58:21 GMT+00:00, Stuart Burns <
>> stuart.james.burns at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well we need to do something ;) The NSA could be spying on us NOW. This
>>> very minute and realising that Mike is on lolcats 24/7
>>>
>>> On 8 December 2014 at 10:41, Michael Crilly <michael at mcrilly.me> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That would be cool. You’re lagging a bit though mate - I suggested a
>>>> crypto-party four weeks ago ;-)
>>>>
>>>> An encrypted mailing list is a bit of an oxymoron. It’s also difficult
>>>> to work with. The only way it would work is if the mailing list server had
>>>> a copy of everyone’s public keys and then auto-encrypted using said keys.
>>>> That’s not very secure, for a compromised server means an easy MITM attack.
>>>>
>>>> > On 8 Dec 2014, at 10:38, Stuart Burns <stuart.james.burns at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > You know, we could have a key signing party one evening. Maybe we
>>>> should also show the way and start using encrypted mailing lists ;)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Chester mailing list
>>>> > Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>> > https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Chester mailing list
>>>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>>>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chester mailing list
>> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
>> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Stuart Burns
> E: stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
> M: [redacted]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chester mailing list
> Chester at mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/chester
>
>
--
Stuart Burns
E: stuart.james.burns at gmail.com
M: [redacted]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/chester/attachments/20141208/3d3637c2/attachment.html>
More information about the Chester
mailing list