[Colchester] Net Neutrality - It's the end of the world as we know
it
Wayland Sothcott
wayland at sothcott.co.uk
Thu Jun 12 12:22:42 BST 2008
Hello
Richard Branson wants to turn the Internet into Virgin TV.
If you think about what we have with the Internet it's pretty mind
blowing from a freedom point of view. You can visit ANY website in the
whole world and you can TCP link to ANY device on the Internet and
anyone one can link to your server running at home. The tools exists to
deny addresses or address ranges but these are fairly blunt and not
generally used much. So far everyones traffic has been free to go where
it wants, no questions asked. Having run an ISP, I know how easy it
would have been to block a bunch of ad hosting sites using a HOSTS file
and maybe a few sites I felt were a bit sick, and maybe the sites of my
competition and maybe some sites that just annoyed me. Currently ISPs
don't do this, but they are thinking about it. We had a letter from the
Government DTI suggesting we as an ISP join some net nanny service to
help save children from paedos, I chucked it in the bin.
IPv6 vastly increases the address range. In future your thumbscan could
form part of your IP address. The routers all set to route IPv6 will
effectively mean they will not route traffic in a neutral manor. They
will be able to give preferential treatment to some companies and
perhaps to some individuals and certainly some servers.
IPv6 is a tool that can be used in different ways, it's not bad in itself.
I am in favour of bandwidth management because bandwidth can be abused
just as spam is an abuse of the freedom of email. However email is
getting to the stage where some spam is allowed and some personal email
is not. If you have a hotmail account you will notice you simply get a
higher class of spam, football tickets and Tescos vouchers rather than
viagra and Nigerians.
For our safety and continued enjoyment of the Internet sites may be
blocked or slowed down. You might chose a VoIP provider but find it
works very badly with your ISP. This is the case with Internet over
mobile phones. They don't want you to install VoIP on your phone and use
that to make calls, so they block it. I am sure very smart people can
get round this but the basic result is that most can't use their choice
of VoIP on a mobile.
Jacqui Smith the Home Secretary said that she would have all paedophiles
register their email addresses with the police who would then tell all
the social networking sites to block these people. Technically that's
the most unworkable idea I have heard. However imagine if all IPv6
traffic carried your thumb print, ISP's could block that thumb printed
traffic from particular servers. Yes you could use someone elses print
and people probably will. The battle between those seeking access and
those blocking access could get very complicated and the ordinary people
would suffer, just as they do at airports.
They always tell us this stuff is good and for the children and to fight
terror, the results speak for themselves. I think we should look into
this Net Neutrality stuff and write letters to our MP's, except that
Newmark never replies.
Here are a couple of links that maybe helpful:
This is a good explanation:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=AA5ZR_jxdXU&feature=related
This one is nice to watch:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=AA5ZR_jxdXU&feature=related
What Paul Watson says: http://www.infowars.com/?p=2640
Also I have recorded the Alex Jones radio show, skip to 3:00 hour, sorry
it's so big I do not have an editing tool:
http://www.sothcott.co.uk/lug/20080612_Thu_Alex.mp3
Let me know what you think.
Wayland.
More information about the Colchester
mailing list