[cumbria_lug] List Archives
Paul Broomfield
cumbria at mailman.lug.org.uk
Tue Apr 22 13:52:00 2003
Err why don't they just have a robots.txt file ?
http://www.robotstxt.org/wc/norobots.html
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cumbria-admin@mailman.lug.org.uk
>[mailto:cumbria-admin@mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Schwuk
>Sent: 22 April 2003 13:40
>To: cumbria@mailman.lug.org.uk
>Subject: [cumbria_lug] List Archives
>
>
>All,
>
>There has been some dicussion about this on the lugmaster
>list, and I thought it best to let you all know:
>
>The archives for this mailing list are publicly accessible.
>This includes being indexed by search engines. Part of the
>information that is archived, and hence accessible, is the
>sender's (_not_ the recipients though) email address.
>
>A few lug members (from other lug's, not Cumbria) have
>complained about this, but short of removing public access to
>the archives nothing can be done about it, and remove public
>archive access is against the nature of a public mailing list,
>IMO. I know that I have found more than a few answers thanks
>to mailing list archives and google, and would hope that other
>people will benefit from ours.
>
>So, in short, unless the majority of list subscribers wish for
>the archives it be 'closed', they will remain open. If you do
>not want your email address to be 'public', use another one
>(hushmail, yahoo, hotmail
>etc) or do not post to the list. You do not have to be
>subscribed to the list to post to it - you can post from a
>'public' address and still receive the list on your 'private' address.
>
>And yes, I think that it is daft that this has to pointed out
>in the first place. It's like having "Caution: Contents are
>hot" on the side of coffee cups...
>
>Cheers,
>--
>Schwuk
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cumbria mailing list
>Cumbria@mailman.lug.org.uk
>http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cumbria
>