[Cumbria] Ideas for Presentations

[Paul Broomfield]

>
>On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 21:02, Schwuk wrote:
>> Schwuk wrote:
>> > Very true, but as the channel only has three regular 
>visitors, it's 
>> > not
>> > really an issue at the moment. If we can get everyone onto 
>IRC, and it 
>> > used on a regular basis the we should be on a more public 
>network (no 
>> > offense Chris).
>> 
>> I should read my own responses before posting properly...
>> 
>> The IRC channel is for the LUG to use (as donated by Chris). 
>Why does 
>> it
>> matter if people can find it, as everyone who will want to (i.e. the 
>> LUG) will know where it.
>Already one LUG member has found it based on the posts to the 
>Mailing list, it is perfectly acceptable for our needs.
>> 
>> Yes, using a more public network *may* bring more people to it, but
>> given the amount of stuff on the mailing list, do we really 
>want a more 
>> 'public' forum?
>It is not a closed network, I can easily setup an alias to 
>irc.clug.org.uk if need be.

Sorry who can setup the alias?

>> 
>> My comment regarding moving to a more public network if traffic was
>> sufficient were simply based on scalability. Chris: do you belive 
>> monkeyircd and it's network are capable of handling increased load?
>
>MonkeyIRCD has capacity enough for the amount of users and 
>traffic our LUG is likely to generate.
>
>> 
>> If Chris believe's that monkeyircd is stable enough for us 
>to use on a
>> regular basis, why do we need to go anywhere else?
>> 
>MonkeyIRCD will be undergoing some major re-routes in March, 
>but this is the only planned maintenance. .
>-- 
>Chris Plant <chris@monkeyircd.org>
>Personal
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cumbria mailing list
>Cumbria@mailman.lug.org.uk 
>http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cumbria
>