[dundee] kernel compilation
Mark Harrigan
dundee at lists.lug.org.uk
Tue Jul 22 00:04:01 2003
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:43:11PM +0100, Andrew Clayton wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 22:22, Mark Harrigan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:07:54PM +0100, keirlawson@btopenworld.com wrote:
> > > can somebody direct me to a site about kernel compilation (newbie) or email me some instructions as to how to recompile a kernel. i need to have the latest one to fix the fuzzy sound.
> >
> > To be honest the best explaination is supplied with the kernel,
> > download it, uncompress it to /usr/src/linux and read the README. Do
>
> It is probably ok to use /usr/src/linux in newer distros, but older
> distros used to have symlinks from /usr/include/linux and
> /usr/include/asm to the right bits of /usr/src/linux
>
> The usr/src/linux HAD to match the version of libc/glibc installed. So
> putting a new kernel source in there would be a major problem. Today,
> certainly with Red Hat, you have a glibc-kernelheaders package which
> contains /usr/inlcude/linux and /usr/include/asm so the symlinking is
> gone.
>
> http://www.kernelnewbies.org/faq/index.php3#headers
>
>
> Anyways I always just use a src directory of my home.
>
Hmm, I've always wondered why people had an obsession about
/usr/src/linux, thanks for clearing that up.
I've only compiled kernels on Redhat 6 or newer and you don't run into
it so I'd hope it's gone now... as does Linus from that e-mail. :)
Mark