[dundee] Image hard drive to file

[Lee Hughes]

you are the voice of reason!!! newbies!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chad Wollenberg <chad at linuxbasement.com> wrote: I'm not sure what you guys are arguing about, but I've imaged partitions mounted in read only mode. 

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Robert McWilliam <rmcw at allmail.net> wrote:
 On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:29:10 +0000 (GMT), "Lee Hughes"
 <toxicnaan at yahoo.co.uk> said:
 
> think next time? is this a wind up?
 
 
I was wondering the same about your responses.
 
 > ask a few professional unix admins, and get back to me with the results?
 
 
I don't care how many professional admins tell me I can't image a
 mounted partition that isn't going to make it true. Being mounted isn't
 the thing that can make the image screwed up it is the fs changing while
 you are imaging it, unmounting isn't the only way to stop a fs changing.
 
 > it's your data, do what you want with it ;-).
 >
 > just do advise people to do that, because
 
 
Has a "not" gone missing or is looking like silly head (twice)
 desirable?
 ________________________________________________________
 Robert McWilliam     rmcw at allmail.net    www.ormiret.com
 
 Everything should be made as simple as possible - but no simpler.
         -- Albert Einstein
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 

dundee GNU/Linux Users Group mailing list
 dundee at lists.lug.org.uk  http://dundee.lug.org.uk
 https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee
 Chat on IRC, #tlug on dundee.lug.org.uk
 



 _______________________________________________
dundee GNU/Linux Users Group mailing list
dundee at lists.lug.org.uk  http://dundee.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee
Chat on IRC, #tlug on dundee.lug.org.uk

       
---------------------------------
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Inbox.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.lug.org.uk/pipermail/dundee/attachments/20080225/de703766/attachment-0001.html