[dundee] What's better than FF3?
Andrew Clayton
andrew at digital-domain.net
Thu Sep 25 19:12:24 UTC 2008
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:05:36 +0100, Dan Bolser wrote:
> A hole in the head?
>
> Should I go back to FF2 or try something new?
>
> The version in the 'CentOS Repo' (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686;
> en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008071616 CentOS/3.0.1-1.el5.centos
> Firefox/3.0.1) has crashed again ... at least this time it didn't
> take down Gnome... I'm getting sick to death of browser crashes
> (SessionManager is the only thing standing between me and Kwonkweror!)
>
> Is it just me or is FF3 slower and less stable than FF2?
I find it OK under Fedora. Are you using adobe's flash plugin by
chance? That does cause problems. I run it through nspluginwrapper so
that it runs out of process and when it dies to doesn't take Firefox
with it.
Maybe Epiphany or Galeon will suit your needs.
Andrew
More information about the dundee
mailing list