[dundee] Emacs and org-mode

[Nistur]

I've just discovered that agsm is part of a harvard package, so I'm
looking at that, I can sort that now. Got examples in the docs :D

We've been told that the references is what we refer to in our text,
whereas the bibliography contains all background reading we've done,
whether we've referred to it or not.

Nistur

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Robert McWilliam <rmcw at allmail.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:12:11PM +0100, Nistur wrote:
>> Ok, getting there. Slowly. Thanks.
>>
>> So, I now have the bibliography added in (manually). I have 2 questions.
>> 1. how do I change it to Harvard style citations? (Blackmore, 2001)
>> rather than [1]
>
> The natbib package adds different citation commands which cite with a
> different styles. \citep or \citep* would give output like (Blackmore,
> 2001) - without the * it puts in et al. when there are more authors,
> with the * it lists them all.
>
>> 2. Is there any way to get it to make a references section and a
>> bibliography? Apparently we need both (yes, I know it's retarded...)
>
> I'm not sure what the difference between the two would be... Have you
> got an example I can have a look at?
>
>    Robert
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Robert McWilliam            rmcw at allmail.net             www.ormiret.com
>
> A slipping gear could let your M203 grenade launcher fire when you
> least expect it. That would make you quite unpopular in what's left of
> your unit. -- the US Army's magazine of preventive maintenance.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dundee GNU/Linux Users Group mailing list
> dundee at lists.lug.org.uk  http://dundeelug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dundee
> Chat on IRC, #tlug on irc.lug.org.uk
>