[Gllug] DHCP & DNS

Fri Dec 7 09:47:21 UTC 2001

On Thursday, 6 Dec 2001, Leigh Mason wrote:
>why not use a 192.168.0.0/24. (192.168.0.1 - 254) This is a class C address
>reserved for private networks and is much easier to keep track of host
>addresses. (254) possible hosts.

No! Not 192.168.0.0/24! Pick a _random_ subnet of 192.168.0.0/16 or
the reserved class Bs specified in RFC 1918. Does no-one actually read
any standards anymore?

-- 
David Damerell <damerell at chiark.greenend.org.uk> flcl?

-- 
Gllug mailing list  -  Gllug at linux.co.uk
http://list.ftech.net/mailman/listinfo/gllug